Site icon Pelican Island Audubon Society

Bringing a community together to work creatively towards agreed upon goals

The President’s Hoot
by Richard H. Baker, Ph.D.
March 2007

I really liked Kenric Ward’s February 1st editorial in the Press Journal where he asked an excellent question: “Is bigger really better?” Sometimes we need to think more broadly about how we can live up to our ideals to make our community better.

First we have to decide, “What do we want?” Then we need to consider, “Are we doing what is needed to achieve that?” Science has determined that to find out how we are doing and whether we are making progress, we should measure the goals objectively. Consistently measuring year-to-year indicators of our quality of life can then become our basis for constructive community action.

Atlantic sunrise by Bob Montanaro.

Let’s have a community dialogue. What is important? How should we assess “quality of life” in Indian River County? Bhutan has won international attention for basing its assessments of quality of life on their people’s overall happiness. The World Health Organization has a Quality of Life Index. UNICEF examined 40 factors, such as poverty, deprivation, health, education, happiness, relationships, and risky or harmful behavior (e.g. drug and alcohol use, sexual activity) and reached the conclusion that the United States and British children are at the bottom of the list of 21 wealthy nations in which to be a child. How do our county children fair on these factors?

Wouldn’t it be great to provide quality of life statistics once a year, for all people, not just children living here? Our newspapers could first carry out a public survey to identify environmental and community components that our citizens consider important to their quality of life. Next the survey could measure each person’s rating of his or her own sense of well being and rate their ideas of our community’s quality of life in general. It would not be easy, but we should try, to obtain a statistically sound sample of the community’s demographics — not leaving any group out, including the homeless.

After obtaining an idea of what to measure, perhaps high school classes guided by college students and professors (along with community retirees) could take on the project. Opening up a community dialogue on what and how to measure the values comprising the county’s quality of life, could be an exciting, real-life learning experience for the whole community. The challenge would be to set up measurements in —

Is our paradise lost, or being saved and growing? If we can first assess where we are, we could then go about planning on where we want to be and how to get there. We can then discuss alternative ways of bringing about a change in our county of which we all could be proud and wholeheartedly choose to live. If you are interested in helping with a project to measure our county’s quality of life, I would very much like to hear from you.

Exit mobile version